Misrepresenting Obama: The Deceptive Fight Against Marriage Equality

Katy Faust's coalition deceptively campaigns to roll back same-sex marriage, misrepresenting Obama's stance and using extreme influencers. Their dishonest tactics, not slim success odds, threaten democratic discourse and civil debate.

Obama’s Stance on Marriage Equality

The quote attributed to Obama– regarding children benefiting from caring mommies, loving dads, and strong marriages– comes from a 2010 event on accountable fathership. It predates his 2012 public support for marital relationship equal rights and has absolutely nothing to do with opposing same-sex marital relationship.

The objective is familiar: roll back same-sex marital relationship. The coalition’s internet site plainly features a picture of Barack Obama alongside widely known anti-LGBTQ figures, suggesting his recommendation of an activity committed to undoing marriage equal rights. It precedes his 2012 public assistance for marriage equality and has absolutely nothing to do with opposing same-sex marital relationship. Nations like Australia and Taiwan legalized same-sex marital relationship despite the very same arguments Faust exported abroad. Same-sex marital relationship is the regulation of the land.

The truth is easy: Barack Obama does not support reversing Obergefell. Same-sex marital relationship is the unwritten law. And no quantity of deceitful branding will certainly alter that fact– no matter just how noisally the haters firmly insist otherwise.

Katy Faust’s Coalition & Tactics

Faust has actually been making the rounds of conservative media given that introducing her brand-new coalition, flaunting regarding its early success and outlining a technique that counts greatly on ideologically lined up influencers. Among those influencers is Steve Deace, a Christian nationalist podcaster whose document consists of repeated require political physical violence and dehumanizing unsupported claims versus perceived adversaries. That Faust sees Deace as a possession instead of a responsibility informs us everything we need to understand about the worths driving this project: outrage over reality, extremism over persuasion, victory regardless.

Marriage equal rights survived the culture wars of the 2010s. Nations like Australia and Taiwan legalized same-sex marital relationship despite the very same disagreements Faust exported abroad.

The Deceptive Campaign Against Equality

The campaign to rescind Obergefell v. Hodges has entered a harmful brand-new phase– one defined not by honest argument, but by distortion, breach of contract, and outright deception. At the center of this most recent initiative is Katy Faust, a long-time anti– marriage-equality lobbyist currently trying to rebrand an old campaign with new strategies. The objective is familiar: roll back same-sex marital relationship. What’s new is exactly how honestly the movement agrees to lie to get there.

The most enlightening step is not who Faust partners with– it’s exactly how her campaign is providing itself to the public. The union’s internet site plainly features a photo of Barack Obama together with widely known anti-LGBTQ figures, implying his recommendation of a motion committed to undoing marital relationship equality. This is not a subtle idea; it is an intentional effort to mislead.

Faust herself has invested a years positioning her personal tale as ethical cover for an anti-LGBTQ schedule. She regularly mentions her lesbian mommy while firmly insisting that same-sex pairs are inherently deficient, a rhetorical step made to preempt allegations of bigotry without actually abandoning it. From united state High court briefs to statement prior to international legislatures, her message has been consistent: LGBTQ families are to be endured psychologically yet declined legitimately.

Eroding Democratic Discourse

What makes this latest initiative troubling is not its possibility of success– it remains slim– but its method. When an activity really feels comfortable incorrectly recommending that a former president supports its reason, it signifies a collapse of honest borders. Democracy depends on common realities. Civil argument depends upon sincerity. Projects improved lies rust both.

Obama’s development on marital relationship equal rights is well recorded. Is the truth that the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges resolved the question of marriage as a constitutional.

Radicalization & The Need for Honesty

Steve Deace’s involvement emphasizes just how radical this activity has actually become. This is a guy who has actually likened political challengers to battle bad guys, called for public executions, and framed social disputes as holy war. When such voices rise as “influencers,” the project stops being about policy or family values and begins being about power and penalty.

This is not a “disagreement.” It is an aware attempt to gaslight the public, laundering extremism with selective quotes and deceptive imagery. If marriage equality is to be tested again, it must be done openly, truthfully, and without dragging uninvolved numbers into a manufactured narrative.