
A gay couple alleges discrimination by a Sheraton in Puerto Vallarta regarding wedding plans, citing a huge price difference compared to heterosexual couples. Raises concerns about LGBTQ+ inclusivity in hospitality.
Couple Alleges Disparate Treatment
A gay couple from Vernon, British Columbia, is speaking out concerning what they describe as unequal treatment by a Sheraton hotel in Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, throughout their wedding event intending procedure– raising problems about justness and inclusivity in the friendliness sector.
Jeremy Alexander and Ryan Sheepwash, who are presently preparing their destination wedding, shared their experience in a now-viral Instagram video. In the clip, Jeremy details their articles and frustrations invoices to back it up. His inscription reads:
“We have actually connected to the couple to read more regarding their experience and are dealing with the building to provide an option,” a spokesperson claimed. The declaration continued, “The Sheraton Buganvilias has been active in the LGBTQ community in Puerto Vallarta for many years, not only holding LGBTQ+ groups and wedding events however likewise supporting Pride occasions.”
Delayed Proposal & Inflated Cost
So I never understood WHY the neighborhood is sooooo up in arms at somebody not desiring our cash. WHY make it a concern. There are lots of services that do not need to be harassed right into doing something they don’t wish to … and WHY would you want them to ?!?!?
Jeremy Alexander and Ryan Sheepwash, who are currently intending their destination wedding event, shared their experience in a now-viral Instagram video clip. According to Jeremy and Ryan, they waited three months to obtain a wedding celebration proposition from the hotel– which came with a jaw-dropping $72,700 rate tag and a required deposit of $36,000. The quote included the wedding event ceremony and guest holiday accommodations and stated that no schedule existed for their preferred date in 2026. For several participants of the LGBTQ+ area, specifically those planning wedding events, this scenario has actually mixed concern.
Heterosexual Friends Receive Lower Quote
According to Jeremy and Ryan, they waited 3 months to obtain a wedding proposition from the resort– which came with a jaw-dropping $72,700 rate tag and a required deposit of $36,000. The quote included the wedding celebration event and visitor lodgings and specified that no availability existed for their wanted date in 2026.
Concerns About Inclusivity
Intending to contrast experiences, some of Jeremy and Ryan’s heterosexual friends reached out to the very same hotel, pretending to be an engaged straight couple. Within a week, the close friends received a quote of just $1,700 for the deposit– and, strangely enough, were told that wedding days were available in 2026 nevertheless.
For many members of the LGBTQ+ neighborhood, particularly those planning wedding celebrations, this situation has actually stirred concern. Puerto Vallarta is extensively recognized as one of one of the most LGBTQ+-friendly locations in Mexico, understood for its Pride celebrations, inclusive nightlife, and welcoming resorts. This event raises essential concerns: Are companies absolutely treating LGBTQ+ clients similarly behind the scenes? And are franchise-based hospitality brands doing sufficient to make certain uniformity in inclusive methods?
In a meeting with NBC News, Ryan and Jeremy described that it had not been simply the numbers that felt off– it was the entire interaction. They likewise asserted this had not been a separated instance. “Simply Google it,” they said, recommending that the hotel has a history of giving same-sex couples much less beneficial treatment.
“Soooo let down that my fiancée and I got discriminated against for our wedding strategies in Puerto Vallarta by #Sheraton !! Most severe of all, they’ve possibly done this to many various other same-sex pairs.”
1 discrimination2 hospitality
3 LGBTQ acceptance
4 Puerto Vallarta
5 Sheraton hotel
6 wedding planning
« Pope Francis & LGBTQ+ Catholics: Progress & ChallengesTransgender Military Ban Faces Skeptical Judges »